tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7427238665701917635.post2722868046102285654..comments2023-07-04T04:04:29.158-07:00Comments on Your Postal Blog: Busting Postal Myths, Day 2, "Inefficient"Benjamin "Benny the Blogger" Franklinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16836872570822325355noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7427238665701917635.post-31077795080682305292010-03-24T11:02:57.524-07:002010-03-24T11:02:57.524-07:00start at Mr. Potters office then on down and leave...start at Mr. Potters office then on down and leave small offices alone.sure where there are 3 offices within 10 miles , i can understand this is not cost effective.but come on all the extra expenses out there.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7427238665701917635.post-51172853942190888052010-03-18T11:02:06.730-07:002010-03-18T11:02:06.730-07:00i agree with top done.they need to start with supe...i agree with top done.they need to start with supervisors. there are to many.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7427238665701917635.post-5771584267077994462010-03-17T06:48:36.907-07:002010-03-17T06:48:36.907-07:00You can make numbers work out to show whatever you...You can make numbers work out to show whatever you want but the bottom line is we are inefficient in some areas. We hire clerks and carriers to work at a certain level but don't hold them to it. We "are" top heavy which gives the perception of being inefficient. Dollar for dollar we need to make adjustments in staffing (top down not bottom up).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7427238665701917635.post-69876520323510800622010-03-17T05:34:42.093-07:002010-03-17T05:34:42.093-07:00How long did it take you to work a tray of letters...How long did it take you to work a tray of letters?? 70 clerks to work 35,000 in a hours....that equals 500 letters per hour or 8.33 letters per minute. Who could ever work mail that slowly? I don't buy that math....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7427238665701917635.post-33353353350698185212010-03-16T11:49:10.756-07:002010-03-16T11:49:10.756-07:00You make some very good points. I was reading an ...You make some very good points. I was reading an article that states that we have cut our craft work force by nearly 25% in the past year. If that is true, why did the HQ staff increase? It would be logical to conclude that if we have less people to supervise, that we would need less supervisors. That is not what I would call efficient!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com